La agencia de investigación en salud EEUU revisa PACE
Publicado: 25 Ago 2016, 16:43
Voy muy justita para dar explicaciones, pero creo que no se ha comentado en el foro esta noticia del mes pasado.
AHRQ Evidence Review Changes Its Conclusions
the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has issued an Addendum to its 2014 ME/CFS evidence review. This Addendum downgrades the conclusions on the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET), and this has tremendous implications for medical education and treatment recommendations.
http://occupyme.net/2016/08/16/ahrq-evi ... nclusions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
La AHRQ cambia sus conclusiones y dice que no se deben seguir los criterios de Oxford en estudios de SFC-EM.
This new analysis was published in late July as an Addendum to the original report (see pages 1-16 of the linked report). This updated review reanalyzed the effectiveness of GET, CBT, and other forms of counseling, first with Oxford studies included and then after Oxford studies were excluded. As we predicted, breaking out the Oxford studies forced a significant downgrade in the review’s conclusions.
QUE hay evidencia insuficiente para desarrollar las terapias GET Y CBT como tratamiento.
There is no evidence that CBT and GET are effective treatments for us, and therefore, these treatments can no longer be recommended. If CDC and others persist in recommending treatments for which there is no evidence of effectiveness in ME/CFS patients, it will not only perpetuate confusion but also put patients at risk. Such an unscientific recommendation goes against the principles of evidence-based medicine and is not accepted in other diseases.
Ahora sólo falta que digan que es perjudicial
AHRQ Evidence Review Changes Its Conclusions
the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has issued an Addendum to its 2014 ME/CFS evidence review. This Addendum downgrades the conclusions on the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET), and this has tremendous implications for medical education and treatment recommendations.
http://occupyme.net/2016/08/16/ahrq-evi ... nclusions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
La AHRQ cambia sus conclusiones y dice que no se deben seguir los criterios de Oxford en estudios de SFC-EM.
This new analysis was published in late July as an Addendum to the original report (see pages 1-16 of the linked report). This updated review reanalyzed the effectiveness of GET, CBT, and other forms of counseling, first with Oxford studies included and then after Oxford studies were excluded. As we predicted, breaking out the Oxford studies forced a significant downgrade in the review’s conclusions.
QUE hay evidencia insuficiente para desarrollar las terapias GET Y CBT como tratamiento.
There is no evidence that CBT and GET are effective treatments for us, and therefore, these treatments can no longer be recommended. If CDC and others persist in recommending treatments for which there is no evidence of effectiveness in ME/CFS patients, it will not only perpetuate confusion but also put patients at risk. Such an unscientific recommendation goes against the principles of evidence-based medicine and is not accepted in other diseases.
Ahora sólo falta que digan que es perjudicial
